Thursday, February 7, 2008

(re)learning good lessons.

i have a very unique privilege: whenever i want, i can sit in on the urban studies class and listen to the guest speakers, particularly, dave batstone. he comes twice a year and it never gets old. today was no different; he shared about his vocational journey and i left inspired, refreshed and pleasantly surprised that one can share the same message in so many different ways.

here is what i (re)learned today:
our biggest obstacles in finding and following through with our vocation are 1. disappointing the people who have dreams for us (ie: fear of upsetting or letting down the goals our parents might have for us) 2. romance / sex / marriage (ie: romantic relationships need to be a partnership on the journey, not a destination) 3. the acquisition of material things (ie: what i have to own and want, which quickly turns into a need). as much as people say "i can't go there- i can't do this- it costs money- money is what separates me from my vocation" etc, that's actually false. when we use money as an excuse, we probably don't want -whatever it is- bad enough. i write all of this not to say that you can't follow through with your vocation if you don't disappoint your parents, you happen to be married or have acquired [unnecessary] material goods-- it's more that when we put those things first, before our vocation, that's when things get sticky.

we are the generation of awareness. meaning, we know about it all (or at least we think we do!). we know about aids, we know about poverty, we know about rwanda, we know about iraq, we know about this-that-and the other thing. it's been shoved in our face and it feels like the baby boomers are saying "it's messed up and you have to fix it." and we are left feeling hopeless. we are left feeling overwhelmed and constantly asking ourselves, "where do i start?" we are lost. we are over-aware. at one point we are going to tell you (older and wiser generation) that we don't want any more information because there is too much to do, too much to know, and too much need. i would say it's part of the reason colleges have tried to stop sending all campus emails unless it's vital. they are over-awaring us and then we stop caring. all together. just stop. so then people like barack obama come along and provide something new and people like hillary clinton wonder why she doesn't have what he has. barack is standing up and saying YES WE CAN. no one else is doing that. no other political candidate is giving hope to the over-aware generation. and people wonder why the youth are attracted to him?

dave has spoken all over the country regarding his book, not for sale. someone asked dave what the difference between a harvard and a westmont student was... he said the difference is in the job at the bus station. for example, harvard students are driving the bus and directing its' path while westmont students are taking the tickets from the passengers. what's worse is that the westmont staff & faculty (some, not all) are teaching and inspiring to the ticket-takers, not the bus drivers. this might be confusing, but ultimately dave was saying that the difference between the two is the attitude and the way harvard students are set up to succeed. you can also replace westmont with any other college that is not an ivy league or well known for its' amazing-ness (ie: wheaton, biola, usf, etc)

last: if you stop asking questions and stop learning and stop being curious, you get old. we don't need more old people, we need more young people. rusty, my 77 year old friend, is a great example of staying young.

8 comments:

Lesley Miller said...

very inspiring for me Emily... I've been thinking a lot about vocation and making some changes/taking risks and getting crazy. Your post inspires me!

Also, I just thought you should know that Anna Q wrote me and said her stat counter shows that most of her traffic comes from my blog. So, I checked my stat counter and a LOT of my traffic comes from YOU! Miss Popularity...

Megan said...

what's this stat counter lesley speaks of? i only have google analytics.

I have to disagree with what Dave says about the difference between a Harvard student and a Westmont one. Am I reading something wrong? I am continually amazed by the students that come out of Westmont and the leadership skills they possess, and how a large portion of them refuse to go into corporate america (like I have chosen) and instead want to be entrepreneur's and voices for causes around the world. Major run-on there, but how is that a ticket-taker?

Anna said...

Meg - I use sitemeter instead of google analytics and it has a "statistics" feature. that's all i feel comfortable saying about that in this public forum :-)

Also, I have to agree with Meg in her disagreement of Mr. Batstone. The liberal arts Christian education certainly focuses on some areas that I doubt are really underlined within the Ivey Leauge, but if anything I feel that that emphasis gives Westmont grads a more complete vision for their future.

emilykatz said...

Hmm. This is what I was trying to say: the Harvard and Westmont student in the beginning are one in the same. However, going to Harvard eventually sets you up to succeed far more than a Westmont student-- and most everyone (students, faculty and staff) subscribes to this idea and it plays out in big ways. Harvard students are naturally ahead... I'm not saying that Westmont students can't or don't succeed- it's just a lot harder for them. I commend those who do. Ultimately, I think the winners are those who follow their vocation.

MicheLe said...

I like Dave, but if he's really saying what you claim he is about Harvard vs. Westmont, then I have to disagree with his definition of success.

MicheLe said...

Sorry--I wasn't done. :-) Bus drivers are not inherently more successful than ticket takers. One is successful when one is where one is called to be. For some that may be driving, for others that may be sweeping.
"I would rather be a gatekeeper in the house of my God than live a good life in the homes of the wicked." Psalm 84:10

Anna said...

To Michele: Oooooh snap. With a Bible verse and everything. Love your point though.

emilykatz said...

the point is this: when you go to harvard you think and feel like you are on top of the world. everyone treats you that way. when you go to westmont no one talks to you like that or treats you that way. the things we say at orientation are like this: "your first semester is going to be very hard- it's not going to be like it was in high school. go residence life. yah student groups look at all these opportunities at westmont. go westmont. feel safe, parents, because we are going to take care of your children. etc etc". it's my understanding that at harvard, they say things like "look around. you're looking at the best of the best. blah blah blah"

yes, michele, your definition of success is a good one-- but all dave was really saying is that he treats his students, when he teaches, like harvard students, not usf students because the reality is there is no difference between a harvard and westmont/usf student.

my apologies for my miscommunications. clearly, you had to be there. or! clealy, i need to take a class on retelling stories.